I'm just going to copy and paste what I said before.
Feel free to disagree with me.
Meh the purported "new" astrological signs that showed up recently really aren't something to gawk over.
1. They don't apply to anyone born before 2009
2. The "New" signs are based on the constellations of stars not the planets in our system. Silly misconception is that astrology doesn't focus where stars are, but more of "Zones".Unfortunately those zones were named at the time when the constellations actually did match up thus each one was given a name like Aries, Scorpio, or Cancer (in No particular order or preference)
3. The "New" signs were developed by an astronomer not an astrologer. Two completely different professions though they do have similarities. One is based in facts and proof the other is based on mathematics and human behavior.
But I will state it is a fun concept I'm usually fond of things uprooting everything we come to know and like. Sadly this one just doesn't quite makes it. Close but no dice.
Though this may come and bite me back in the butt I still stand by ...my "Meh." statement.
~~~~~~~~~
So yeah that and I accepted a 100 theme challenge X.X
Kill me now this is a giant undertaking so fun i couldn't resist
What have i got myself into ?
So look for stuff of that coming later this weekend
I've been working on a few
So they'll be up in a bit
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lastly I'm so excited.
I get to see my fiance today after a whole month of us being apart.
~squee
That is all you may resume your daily lives
D.R.G.
~Lily~